It’s on folks. Proud to be part of a coalition of over two dozen diverse neighborhoods and groups appealing MHA EIS. More at seattlefairgrowth.org http://ow.ly/V2Iq30gSz2J
by Jon Lisbin
A recent article in crosscut debated how “Amazon earned Seattle’s Scorn – and whether it’s deserved.”
I personally think this is all about relationship building. If the city wants to work cooperatively with Amazon both parties must form a better relationship. One based on mutual trust.
Amazon isn’t a cold edifice. At the risk of sounding like Romney, it is composed of people, most of them who live in our community. I am sure the company wants to see improvements in transportation, safety issues and housing for the 10’s of thousands of Amazon employees trying to get to work and live in this city.
It’s not a black and white issue. For the city to have any leverage it does need a reset, but to me that means building a relationship that balances concerns rather than the transactional one it currently has. What are your thoughts?
Jenny Durkan meet the new boss! $611,000 in donations from the CASE PAC, including Amazon, Vulcan, Clise, Centurylink and others.
by Jon Lisbin
I am throwing my support behind Jon Grant for City Council position 8, and I’d like to explain why you should too. I believe he fits both the values of our community as well as mine as a small business owner.
- Jon was the only member the top down Housing and Livability Agenda committee who abstained from the final vote because he knew that neighborhoods and the community were getting the shaft.
- He supports developer impact fees so growth can pay for growth and address the school capacity crisis Seattle is facing.
- He wants to bring back the voice of the neighborhood by funding the neighborhood councils that the city recently cut ties with.
- He understands that we need to tie infrastructure to growth. They must be concurrent!
Small Business Policies:
- A city sponsored pension plan to attract talented workers.
- B&O tax exemption from $100,000 to $1,000,000 in gross revenue
- Commercial rent control to protect against rent hikes
- Zoning incentives to provide new commercial space for small businesses
- Municipal bank to provide low interest loans
I have witnessed the displacement of small businesses throughout the city due to the pressures of high end development. We’re seeing that now in lower Queen Anne as upzones (changes to zoning which allow greater height in exchange for “affordable housing”) are being proposed that will displace small businesses as affordable office space gets bought by investors and redeveloped into high end Class A units. What will happen to all the artists, small architectural firms, marketing companies and entrepreneurs who no longer can afford their leases? Seattle is growing at an incredible pace and its economy is soaring; but we must ensure that we don’t kill the goose in pursuit of the golden egg.
Special interests and Independent Expenditures have had a corrosive effect on City Hall. Democracy Vouchers are being used for the first time this year for the purpose of leveling the field. Jon has received $300,000 in Democracy Vouchers which has funded 90% of his campaign. Now is time to elect leaders, like Jon, who truly represent their constituents.
Jon is endorsed by community advocates like Nick Licata and City Councilmember Lisa Herbold. His opponent is endorsed by the build at all costs wing of the council including Mike O’brien, Sally Bagshaw, Rob Johnson and Lorenza Gonzalez. It’s critical that we change that balance now!
In summary, Jon represents the neighborhoods, small businesses and the people who live in Seattle; not downtown developers, real estate and business interests. In fact, he refuses to take donations from developers, big corporations or CEO’s. I hope however he will take money from me 🙂
Is Seattle For Everyone a front for Paul Allen’s Vulcan? Somebody’s paying the bills and it sure ain’t us. #HALANo http://ow.ly/6fdY30fclo0
Meet Jon Grant in Wallingford this Thursday. Jon is running for City Council Position 8. He is the voice we need! http://ow.ly/E0DF30fckLw
The City wants eviscerate design review for neighborhood scale projects. Please attend the public hearing and voice your support for keeping design review as an important checks and balances in neighborhood developments.
Monday, September 11, 2017, at 7:00 p.m
SIFF Cinema Uptown, Auditorium 3
511 Queen Anne Avenue North
Seattle, WA 98109
by John Fox –
Ballots are mailed out Wednesday for the August 1st primary and it’s a critical election for Seattle’s future. Even though elections are probably far from your mind – only about 30-35% of you will take time to vote in an ‘off-year’ primary – Seattle is in a hotly contested race for Mayor and our remaining two ‘at large’ or citywide council races.
We’ve either interviewed or closely reviewed where candidates stand, especially front-runners, across the critical issues affecting our neighborhoods, and on racial and economic justice issues, housing and land use, homelessness, police accountability and ensuring equity and fairness for all in our city. Here are our endorsements.
(Following this column, we’ve posted Neil Power’s interview with Oliver and reprinted our earlier interview with Hasegewa.)
The Race for Mayor: Nikkita Oliver or Bob Hasegawa
Among the six frontrunners, only Bob Hasegawa and Nikkita Oliver measured up. Both were seriously willing to call for reassessment of the so-called Housing Affordability and Livability Agenda (HALA) upzones. Both backed increasing the developer’s mandatory affordable housing set-aside to 25% of new units rather than the current paltry 2-11%. They gave unqualified support for requiring developers to pay impact fees for a portion of the infrastructure demanded by their projects. And they would require developers to replace at comparable price any existing low-cost housing they remove.
Both Hasegawa and Oliver favored decisions derived from the bottom up over technocratic and elitist solutions. Both called for a re-establishment of the District Neighborhood Council system and pledged to make sure it was more broadly representative and racially diverse, not arrogantly eliminated. Both supported new measures to preserve tree canopy, and older historic and culturally significant buildings and places like Chinatown/International District and Little Saigon now in the wrecking ball’s crosshairs.
Both were critical of the Mayor’s insensitive sweeping of homeless encampments and understood the connection between the continuing loss of existing low-income housing to redevelopment and the rise of homelessness in our city. Both questioned the propriety of spending $200 million dollars for a new youth jail and called for a closer look at alternatives to incarceration. Both understood the treatment-first model and the importance of diversion programs over jail.
The other frontrunners, Jenny Durkan, Cary Moon, Mike McGinn, and Jessyn Farrell, all unreservedly support the HALA upzones. All are “supply siders” who believe that by adding to the supply of expensive housing, somehow affordable units will “trickle down” to the poor. As Joe Hill, the great labor organizer, said, “There’ll be pie in the sky when you die.”
None of these four candidates expressed any great concern about the continuing loss of existing low-cost housing to demolition. In their minds, displacement and gentrification are addressed by spending more tax dollars on low-income units while pressing the accelerator on more market-rate development.
Moon saw the need for some kind of speculator or foreign investor tax, however, and McGinn, Moon, and Farrell have given a qualified “yes” on questionnaires when asked about developer impact fees. But by and large, electing any one of the four is a vote for the status quo.
Durkan has been anointed by the establishment and big business to carry their mantle – raising $321,000 mostly from this crowd (outspending her nearest competitor 3-1). As if that wasn’t enough, the the Chamber and Hospitality industry just dropped $50,000 into their ‘PAC’ to back her.
Moon, Farrell, and McGinn are fighting for the “urbanist vote”, those who think density is a religion. Never mind we’re drowning in it now or that it’s destroying the livability and affordability of our city.
McGinn, says he’s mellowed but this is the guy who as Mayor shamelessly handed millions of our tax dollars over to Vulcan in South Lake Union, did nothing to stop demolition of low cost housing and consequent rise in homelessness, and, at the request of a handful of developers, scuttled the Roosevelt Neighborhood Plan that took them a decade to develop.
District 8: Jon Grant
In the race for this open seat, Jon Grant has called for substantial increase in the mandatory housing set-aside to 25%. The other putative frontrunner, Teresa Mosqueda, says she cares about the homeless and about racial and economic inequality, but then on land use and zoning and housing matters she shows a density-at-all-costs pro-development mentality regardless of the impacts. And if you would like to return to the politics of a councilmember like Richard Conlin–defeated a few years ago when voters tired of his consistently pro-downtown and special interest-driven agenda–then vote for Sara Nelson.
While we like Sheley Secrest’s stance on HALA and the upzones and her strong positions on police accountability and racial justice, her lack of campaign dollars likely precludes her ability to get her message out and get through to the final. In this race, we believe Grant has a chance to win while offering our neighborhoods and tenants the best chance for progressive and responsive change.
District 9: Anybody but Gonzalez
It’s hard for us to imagine any candidate having a chance against Lorena Gonzalez who now holds this seat. With a growing war chest funded by downtown and developer interests, she’ll likely outdistance all the others combined when primary votes are counted. Unfortunately, she’s zealously pro-HALA, pro-developer and pro-upzone, second only perhaps to current District 4 Councilmember Rob Johnson. She only shows up at Land Use and Housing Committee meetings to vote as desired by her developer pals. Gonzalez’s campaign will shower voters with warm and fuzzy mailings featuring big-shot endorsements, while her opponents, lacking funds for even one direct mailing, will barely register in the minds of voters.
The Seattle Neighborhood Coalition and Seattle Fair Growth are pleased to have two programs dedicated to extended meetings with Seattle Mayoral Candidates. At each of the June and July meetings we will have one hour individual sessions with 3 different candidates. The candidates will make opening and closing statements, respond to a few fixed questions from the SNC and SFG and then respond to audience questions.
*** PLEASE NOTE that the June 10 meeting will start at 1 pm and be at a different location, Black Zone (2301 S Jackson Street, which is at 23rd Ave S and South Jackson St where the Red Apple Market is located). Black Zone is located in the building just to the west of the Red Apple. There is plenty of free parking, and the site can be reached by the 8, 14 and 48 bus). Rather than a breakfast meeting, there will be finger foods and beverages. Admission will be $10, but no one will be turned away for lack of funds.
The July 8th meeting returns to our regular location at the The Central (Central Area Senior Center), but will have an 8:30 start time.
Join us at both Mayoral Candidate meetings for what should be informative and detailed conversation with our leading candidates.